Published on July 6, 2023

Reading Time: 10 min

UCAT Decision Making Tips, Questions & Strategies

Decision Making is the second section of the UCAT test which assesses your ability to deduce information from complex sources of data. It tests how well you can interpret and decipher details, and extrapolate inferred information to derive conclusions.

The Decision Making section comes before the Verbal Reasoning section and after the Abstract Reasoning section. The data within the questions is given in the form of passages, graphs, charts, visual diagrams, and text. Some questions have concepts taken from Verbal Reasoning and Quantitative Reasoning. It’s worth revising some critical thinking material to prepare for this section.

In this article, you’ll learn how to answer questions involving Venn diagrams, syllogisms, drawing conclusions, shape equations, and more! The best time-saving strategies are explained in detail to help you understand each question.

UCAT Decision Making Score

In 2022, the Decision Making UCAT subtest had the second lowest overall average score of 616. From 2018-2022, the Decision Making subtest average scores have ranged between 610-625, making it the second lowest scoring section next to Verbal Reasoning. Keep reading our blog post for the best tips and tricks to acing UCAT Decision Making, as well as sample questions and explanations!

What’s a Good UCAT Decision Making Score?

A “good” Decision Making score would be one that’s above the average for your testing cycle. Normally, universities will focus on your overall UCAT score rather than looking at individual subsections. Our free resource has the most up-to-date UCAT scores needed for medicine for each university in 2023. Check out ‘Master the UCAT by the Top 1%‘, our #1 Amazon Bestselling UCAT book (second edition updated for the 2023 UCAT syllabus) to learn all the tips and tricks necessary for improving your score and achieving 800+ on Decision Making!

UCAT Decision Making Time

There are 29 questions in the UCAT Decision Making subtest with 31 minutes given for this section, giving you approximately 64 seconds per question.

Decision Making Question Types

The various types of Decision Making questions are listed in the table below. Some questions will take longer to complete, while some should take less time. You can refer back to this table once you familiarise yourself with the types of questions. A large portion of questions will require use of your whiteboard, and some will require you to use the on-screen calculator.

CategoryQuestion TypesTime NeededNumber of Questions
Statistical and Figural Reasoning– Venn Diagrams
– Probabilistic Reasoning
– Probabilistic Reasoning
– 40-60 seconds
Approximately 8-9 Qeestions
Deductive Reasoning– Syllogisms
– Logical Puzzles
– Shape Equations
– 60-80 seconds
– 20-30 seconds for shape equations
Approximately 9-11 Questions
Evaluating Arguments– Justifying Assumptions
– Drawing Conclusions
– 20-40 secondsApproximately 10-11 Questions

There are two formats of questions in Decision Making:

  1. Multiple Choice Questions: You are given a choice of 4 possible answers where you must select one. Each question is worth a single mark.
  2. 5 Statement Questions: Each question has 5 statements. You must assign either “Yes” or “No” to each statement.
    • 5 correct = 2 marks
    • 4 correct = 1 mark
    • < 3 correct = 0 marks

See our example questions below to give you an idea of the general strategies used in UCAT Decision Making. We dive deeper into Decision Making strategies in our UCAT resources by top 1% scorers, such as our 2-day live UCAT course, our 175-lesson online UCAT course (bite-sized video lessons), best-selling UCAT book (updated for 2023), and one-to-one UCAT tutoring.

UCAT Decision Making Probabilistic Reasoning

  • To work out the probability of an event and another event, multiply each individual probability.
  • To work out the probability of an event or another event, add the individual probabilities.


Natalia tosses an unbiased 2-sided coin. 

  1. What is the probability that it lands on heads? 
  2. If she tosses it twice, what is the probability that it will land on heads both times? 
  3. If she tosses it twice, what is the probability of landing on both heads and tails, in any order? 


The tree diagram shows the probability of landing on heads of tails in the first and second outcome:

UCAT Decision Making Probabilistic Reasoning
  • 1. The probability that it lands on heads the first time is ½. 
  • 2. The first outcome must be heads and the second outcome must be heads. The two probabilities you must consider are as follows:
  • 3. The probability of landing on heads first, then tails, can be calculated by multiplying the individual probabilities of both outcomes, as follows:
  • The same can be done to calculate the probability of landing on tails first, then heads:
  • Because there are two ways that this combination of outcomes can occur, the two individual probabilities for each combination need to be added up. Therefore, the probability of landing on heads and tails, in any order (i.e. the first combination or the second combination) is:

UCAT Decision Making Shape Equations

Each Shape Equations question consists of four rows. Each row is an equation made of shapes. The final row has a missing shape, which you will need to decipher. This form of maths isn’t commonly practiced, so despite the equations being generally simple, they can be challenging to understand. Your whiteboard or scratchpad will be essential here. Many students like to replace the shapes with letters and solve each question algebraically, while others prefer to work with shapes. It typically takes far less time to solve equations using letters, but you can use whichever method you find easiest.


UCAT Decision Making Shape Equations

The correct answer is D. Below we will demonstrate a solution using shapes, but feel free to try this equation out algebraically as well. Remember, the first three rows are equations 1, 2, and 3 respectively, while the final row is equation 4.


Start with the equation that has a missing variable – equation 4. There are four different shapes, so we must try to reduce the number of shapes in order to solve the equation. If any equations from 1-3 can easily replace any of the shapes in equation 4, they should be substituted now.

  1. Equation 3 is simple: 1 star = 2 hearts. Substitute the star in equation 4 for 2 hearts. This will reduce the number of shapes in equation 4 from four to three.
  2. You can now go back to equations 1-3 to find anything else that can be substituted into equation 4. The triangle in equation 2 is equal to 1 circle and 1 heart. We can remove the triangle in equation 4 by substituting it for a circle and a heart. The goal is to reduce the number of shapes in the equation, and by replacing the triangle for a circle and heart, the number of shapes in equation 4 will be reduced from three to two.
  3. You can now rearrange the equation:
    • 1 circle + 3 hearts = 1 circle + 1 heart + ?
    • A circle on each side of the equals sign cancels out, and a heart on the right side can be subtracted on the left side to give two hearts on the left. This gives the following:
    • 2 hearts = ?
  4. We know from equation 3 that 1 star = 2 hearts. Therefore, 2 hearts = 1 star. The missing shape is a star.

UCAT Decision Making Evaluating Arguments

An argument is a set of reasons that address a problem or an idea, either given in support of or against it. It’s made up of premise(s) and a conclusion (Yes/No), with the premise(s) acting as evidence for the conclusion.

Factors That Strengthen an ArgumentFactors That Weaken an Argument
The premises are based on facts/research/studiesThe premises are based on opinion or subjectivity
The premises are directly linked to the subject of the argumentThere is no clear link between the premise and the subject of the argument
The conclusion logically follows from the premisesThe premises do not cover all of the points of the argument
No assumptions are madeAssumptions re made
No external knowledge is usedExternal knowledge is used
  1. Understand the subject matter and identify key points. What exactly is being asked? Is the idea universal or does it refer to a specific group?
  2. Read the arguments (all of the answer options). There are likely to be options that have the correct conclusion (Yes/No) but have illogical or irrelevant reasoning. You cannot choose a conclusion (Yes/No) without reading the full argument, as the correct conclusion must be paired with the correct premises to support it.
  3. Eliminate any arguments that are weak due to assumptions, bias, irrelevance, or subjectivity.
  4. Evaluate the remaining arguments, separating them into premises and conclusions. Identify whether the premises specifically address each of the key points in the idea. Eliminate any argument that misses out a key point.
  5. Select the strongest argument. This should be relevant to the topic, evidence-based, and address all of the key points in the idea. You may not find the best argument to support or reject the idea, but it should be the best out of all of the options presented.


Should the legal driving age be reduced to 15 to overcome the issue of illegal driving?

Select the strongest argument from the statements below.

A. Yes, if younger people can drive, they will be happier citizens and abide by the laws.

B. Yes, by reducing the driving age you will reduce the number of young people smoking cannabis on the street.

C. No, because 15-year-olds are not mature enough to drive, so they may cause more care accidents.

D. No, because studies have shown that there is no association between age and likelihood of illegal driving.

The correct answer is D.


A. This is a subjective statement that is irrelevant as it isn’t directly addressing the subject matter. Although “abiding by the law” can refer to the avoidance of illegal driving, it’s not directly clear, and there’s no evidence provided. Therefore, this is a weak argument.

B. This statement is irrelevant as it’s making its own argument, providing a different outcome of a reduced driving age. There is also no evidence provided to suggest that the number of young people smoking cannabis on the street wil be reduced simply by reducing the driving age. Therefore, this is also a weak argument.

C. This is another subjective statement and it doesn’t address the issue of illegal driving. It addresses a separate issue which is unrelated to the subject matter. Therefore, it is a weak argument.

D. This statement directly addresses the subject matter, providing a factual basis, therefore it’s a strong argument. Because there is no association between age and likelihood of legal driving, there is no need to reduce the legal driving age in an attempt to decrease illegal driving.

UCAT Decision Making Venn Diagrams

A Venn diagram is used to represent relationships between different elements, with overlaps suggesting a common factor, and the non-overlapping areas suggesting something unique to the set in question. Venn diagrams can come in different shapes, sizes, and combinations.

To learn more about the 7 types of Venn diagrams, including image examples, check out our free resource on UCAT Syllogisms.

UCAT Decision Making Logical Puzzles

Logical puzzle scenarios in UCAT Decision Making involve a large number of details which you must interpret in a format that’s reasonable for yourself to understand. They can be nearly impossible to solve without using a whiteboard to simplify the information. Logical puzzles may appear as a drag-and-drop format, but are generally in the form of option selection.


Daniel, Mohammed, Adrian, Aaron, Stephanie, and Rachel went shopping together and bought trousers. These trousers were either short, medium, or long in length and black, red, or grey in colour.

  • Only one of the friends had medium length trousers
  • Daniel’s trousers were long and were not black in colour
  • There was one more pair of long trousers than short trousers
  • Mohamed and Rachel bought the exact same trouser length and colour combination
  • The length of Daniel’s trousers was exactly the same as Rachel’s
  • The number of black trousers was equal to the number of long ones
  • There was only one pair of red trousers and they belonged to Daniel
  • Rachel’s trousers were grey in colour

Which of the following combinations of trouser length and colour is possible?

A. Adrian’s trousers were medium and black.

B. Rachel’s trousers were short and grey.

C. Aaron’s trousers were medium and grey.

D. Daniel’s trousers were short and red.


We can fill in a table using the information as follows:

NameTrouser LengthTrouser Colour

It’s clear from the table that options B, C, and D cannot be true. Rachel’s trousers are long, Aaron’s are black, and Daniel’s are long. The question asks what is possible. Adrian’s trousers must be black, and they are either short or medium length. Thus, it’s possible that they are medium length.

UCAT Decision Making Tips

Tips for Shape Equations

Find the Answer Within Equations 1-3

After making some substitutions to equation 4, you’ll often find that you are left with a question mark on one side, which represents a single missing shape, and the other side looks exactly like one of the sides present in equations 1-3. You can use that equation to deduce the shape that’s represented by the question mark.

Find the Fastest Way To Solve an Equation

There are many ways to solve an equation. You need to find the fastest and most effective way to do so. During your Decision Making practice, if there’s a question that’s taken you many, many steps to solve, try it again. Find a faster way, as there will be one. This will help you quickly solve future questions that have a similar pattern of equations.

Know Which Equations Need To Be Discarded

Any equation with a shape that exists nowhere else in all of the equations should be discarded immediately. That equation is there to waste your time. You can rearrange and substitute as much as you like, but you’ll always have that single shape that you cannot make use of.

Don’t Add Extra Shapes Into Equation 4

Try not to substitute any shape into equation 4 that doesn’t already exist there. Sometimes, it will be necessary to do so, as you might need to completely replace one of the shapes in equation 4 with another one in order to solve the equation. However, unless you recognise an absolute need to add an extra shape, do not do this!

Tips for Evaluating Arguments

Only Use the Knowledge Presented to You

It’s important to ensure no bias is present in your thought process when evaluating an argument. The questions will commonly contain themes that are of general knowledge, so many students may have their own opinions on them. Furthermore, when a question is worded as “Should X occur?”, it’s easy to use your own biases when deciding the correct answer. However, you must ensure that you only use the knowledge presented to you and evaluate the argument based on facts and relevance to the subject matter.

Tips for Venn Diagrams

Eliminate and Estimate
  1. If you’re running out of time, you can guess an answer after eliminating some options, as your chances of guessing the correct answer increase after each elimination. You may find it quicker to draw your own Venn diagram, but generally, this can take much longer as you need to continually account for each of the values added in each overlap of a circle, subtracting it from the total. Also, you don’t need to go in order of the paragraph, but rather you can choose any sentence and eliminate in a way that works for you. However, if you have a routine of following the order of the paragraph, this may save you time as your brain is accustomed to answering the question in a specific way.

We hope this article was useful for your UCAT preparation! It’s an excerpt from our popular UCAT resources, created by top 1% scoring candidates!

Check out the best UCAT resources, such as our 2-day live UCAT course, online UCAT course (175 lessons), UCAT book, and one-to-one UCAT tutoring for more UCAT support.

Related Posts

Some of Our Partners