Understanding the UK’s Assisted Dying Bill – Interview Hot Topics 2025

Assisted dying and euthanasia has always been a prominent topic for medical school interviews. However, recently, there has been legal updates on the assisted dying bill. This makes this topic even more relevant for medical applicants.

Key Update on 2025 Assisted Dying Bill (16/05/2025)

On May 16th, 2025, the UK Parliament continued its debate on the Assisted Dying Bill, a controversial but important topic in healthcare. The bill, introduced by Labour MP Kim Leadbeater, has sparked public and political interest due to its potential to legalise assisted dying for terminally ill adults in England and Wales. Over 150 amendments have been proposed, showing how complex and sensitive this issue is.

This development is especially relevant for aspiring medical students, as it raises major questions about ethics, law, and the responsibilities of future doctors.

Overview of 2025 Assisted Dying Bill (UK)

Kim Leadbeater MP Proposition

Kim Leadbeater, a Labour MP, introduced the Assisted Dying Bill in early 2025. Her goal is to give mentally competent, terminally ill adults the right to request medical assistance to end their lives. She says this will reduce suffering and give patients more control over their final days.

Leadbeater has stressed that this is not about encouraging death, but about allowing dignity, choice, and relief from unbearable pain when all other medical options have been exhausted.

Assisted Dying bill’s objectives and scope

The bill applies to adults who:

• Have less than six months to live
• Are mentally capable of making healthcare decisions
• Have lived in England or Wales for at least one year

The process involves two independent doctors assessing the patient, a waiting period between two declarations, and a final approval from a professional oversight panel. The law aims to include strong safeguards to prevent misuse and protect vulnerable people.

Key Legal and Ethical Considerations

GMC & BMA stance: neutrality vs opposition

The General Medical Council (GMC) and British Medical Association (BMA) both have carefully worded positions on assisted dying. The BMA moved to a neutral stance in 2021, meaning they neither support nor oppose the idea. The GMC focuses on professional behaviour and patient safety.

For a full breakdown, see our article on Beneficence in medical ethics.

Autonomy vs sanctity of life

This is one of the biggest ethical dilemmas. Should a patient’s autonomy (right to choose) outweigh the sanctity of life (belief that life is always valuable)?

Some say people should have the right to die on their own terms. Others believe legalising assisted dying devalues life, especially for the sick or disabled.

You can learn more in our guide to the Four Pillars of Medical Ethics.

Risk of coercion and slippery slope arguments

Critics worry that legalising assisted dying could put pressure on vulnerable people—like the elderly, disabled, or those with mental health problems—to choose death.

The “slippery slope” argument suggests that even strict rules could loosen over time, leading to more relaxed laws and potential misuse. This fear makes many politicians cautious about supporting the bill.

What is the role of a doctor in the assisted dying bill?

Verifying eligibility of terminally ill adults

Doctors will be responsible for confirming that the patient meets all criteria:

• Less than six months to live
• Mental competence
• Voluntary and informed decision

Two doctors must independently agree before the process can move forward. This ensures fairness and safety.

Safeguarding: mental competence tests, palliative care and alternatives

Before anything happens, doctors must ensure the patient fully understands their options and is not being pressured. Patients will be offered information about palliative care and emotional support.

Mental health checks will confirm that the patient can make rational decisions. This step is crucial to protect those who may be depressed or confused.

For more, read our article on Palliative Care and Safeguards.

Impact on doctor-patient trust

Introducing assisted dying changes the relationship between patients and doctors. While some argue it builds trust through honesty and respect for wishes, others fear it could make patients worry that doctors might give up on them.

This is why clear communication, compassion, and patient-centred care are more important than ever.

How to Discuss Assisted Dying in Medical School Interviews

Assisted dying is a common topic in medical school interviews. Interviewers want to know if you can understand both sides of a controversial issue, stay calm under pressure, and show empathy.

Here’s how to approach it:

• Be balanced: acknowledge both ethical and legal arguments
• Stay respectful: people have strong beliefs on this issue
• Use ethical frameworks like the Four Pillars
• Show understanding of the patient experience

How to answer MMI stations on end-of-life care

MMI (Multiple Mini Interview) stations may ask you to:

• Reflect on a case where a patient requests assisted dying
• Discuss the law and ethics of euthanasia
• Explore your own beliefs respectfully

Prepare by reading real stories, reviewing GMC guidance, and practising with friends. Use the SPIES framework (Seek information, Patient safety, Initiative, Escalate, Support) to stay organised.

See our guide to MMI Practice Question to build confidence.

Tips on showing empathy, legal knowledge and professionalism

1. Empathy – Acknowledge how hard it must be for patients and families to face terminal illness.

2. Legal Knowledge – Know the current UK law (assisted dying is still illegal in most of the UK) and any proposed changes like this bill.

3. Professionalism – Respect all viewpoints, maintain confidentiality, and show a calm, reasoned approach.

Example answer:

“This is a difficult issue. I believe it’s important to respect a patient’s autonomy but also ensure they are fully informed and supported. I would focus on understanding their needs, explaining palliative options, and following legal and ethical guidelines.”

Case Study: Esther Rantzen’s advocacy and its public impact

Dame Esther Rantzen, a well-known TV presenter, revealed she has terminal cancer and supports the Assisted Dying Bill. She has said that having the choice would give her comfort, even if she never uses it.

Her story has sparked huge media attention and influenced public opinion. Many people have said they support the bill because of her honesty and bravery.

This case shows how personal experiences can shape national debates, making it an excellent example to include in your interviews or personal statements.

FAQs

What is the current status of the Assisted Dying Bill in the UK?

As of May 2025, the bill is being debated in Parliament and may go through several more rounds of discussion and amendment. It is not yet law.

How should medical applicants approach assisted dying questions in interviews?

Show a balanced view, explain key ethical principles, and avoid extreme positions. Use real-life examples and stay calm under pressure.

What are the main ethical issues surrounding euthanasia?

• Autonomy vs. sanctity of life
• Patient suffering vs. protecting vulnerable people
• Role of healthcare professionals in end-of-life decisions

Is assisted dying legal for doctors in the UK?

No, it is still illegal in most of the UK. Assisting someone to die is a criminal offence. This new bill could change that in England and Wales if passed.